Quirino Grandstand Hostage Drama Essay

I. INTRODUCTIONAlthough the floor of kidnapping and warranter-taking is a very long unrivaled, it is only relatively latterly that there has been a systematic attempt to understand the make, both semipermanent and short-term, on individuals and their families. This is an important issue for clinical and academic reasons. The advice of mental wellness professionals is sought with increasing frequency with regard to the strategic management of security incidentals and the clinical management of those who fill been abducted. thither is evidence to suggest that how outdo to help those who have been taken warrantor is a sensitive and multiform matter, and those who deal with such(prenominal) individuals should be as well informed as possible since such government issues can have long-term adverse consequences, speci every last(predicate)y on young children.The Manila hostage crisis, withdrawicially known as the Rizal Park hostage-taking incident occurred when a dismissed Phil ippine National guard ships officer took over a tourist bus in Rizal Park, Manila, Philippines on August 23, 2010. Disgruntled former senior inspector Rolando Mendoza of the Manila guard govern (MPD) hijacked a tourist bus carrying 25 people (20 tourists and a tour guide from Hong Kong, and four Filipinos) in an attempt to get his project back. He say that he had been summarily and un middlingly dismissed, and that all he wanted was a fair hearing and the fortune to defend himself. Negotiations stony-broke down dramatically somewhat ten hours into the stand-off, when the legal philosophy arrested Mendozas blood brother and thus incited him to open fire. As the shooting began, the bus driver managed to escape, and was shown on television saying Everyone is dead before be whisked away by policemen.Mendoza and eight of the hostages were killed and a number of others injured. The MPDs failed rescue attempt and gun-battle with the hijacker, which took fair(a) about 90 minute s, were watched by millions on live television and the internet. The Philippine and Hong Kong governments conducted divert in empowerigations into the incident. Both inquiries judged that the victims had been unlawfully killed, and identified the Philippine officials poor handling of the incident as the cause of the eight hostages deaths. The assault mounted by the MPD, and the resulting shoot-out, have been widely criticized by pundits as bungled and incompetent, and the Hong Kong Government has issued a black travel alert for the Philippines as a result of the affair.II. reach OF THE STUDYIt was August 23, 2010 when the whole world alarmed in one of the most tragic hostage taking happened in Quirino Grandstand Manila, Philippines. many a(prenominal) people were sad and shocked to what happened in the said event. At about 930 in the morning, dismissed commission police officer Rolando Mendoza took hostage 25 tourists from Hongkong and some Filipino staff who were in a bus to lea ve Fort capital of Chile for Manilas Rizal Park. The ensuing hostage lasted 11 hours and ended with nine individuals, including the hostage taker, dead.1 and the other hostages were injured. harmonise to the report Mendoza is a hard-working and kind. He received lots of award for universe brave and loyal to his profession. Mendoza said he was summarily dismissed without the opportunity to properly defend himself, and that all he wanted was a fair hearing.2 and to get his job back. He did this way just to get tutelage the government official.As we all know Media is the most likely stemma of teaching for most people. In this kind of situation it is very life-threatening job for the media because he has to put himself in a place that should be right.3 except in what happened in the Quirino Grandstand Hostage taking crisis it appear that many media people were burdend because they reported beyond the limit.We ar in the fact that a media person serve as access of information of issues that are of public concern even if they are at risk. There were many media lapses in that incident. Towards the evening of the hostage taking, many media networks were covering the hostage taking crisis live. Among none of them did it seem to have occurred to that irresponsible coverage of the event could cost lives.4 Some of them during the hostage event reported the unconfirmed information, they revealed the police and troops movement and many much lapses that caused the anger of Mendoza.III. BEHAVIORAL abstract (HOSTAGE TAKER AND CAPTIVE/S)IV. MOTIVES IN THE INCIDENTTaking hostages has a long biography as a method, with variable goodness, of securing concessions from individuals, organisations and governments. More recently, it has become a public tactic among terrorist organisations. Although the resilience of individuals should never be underestimated, there is evidence that being taken hostage can have enduring effects, particularly on children. Individuals vary i n how they cope with such an experience, both during and subsequent to it.The literary productions demonstrates that the research base is limited, and many important questions remain to be answered. Hostage-taking is an welkin of clinical and scientific interest. Apart from the need to establish the most effective post-incident interventions for individual hostages and their families, there are opportunities to develop further insights into the dynamics and effects of unequal power relationships.V. PROBLEMSThe ideal equipment of a hit team more or less are as follows communication apparatus, armor vest, helmets, squander mask, pistols, assault rifles for close quarter battle, handcuffs, synchronized watches, binoculars, telescopes, night vision goggles, batter rams, ladders, ropes, stun grenades, teargas, smoke grenades, stick lights, flashlights, spotlights, telescopic gun sights, hydraulic jacks, dispel cutters, glass shutter explosives, fire extinguisher, firemans ax, chain saw, hit van, gloves, carpentry tools, acetylene torch and rain gears. There was lack of equipment on the part of Manila SWAT to handle the situation. Although they had their basic weapons such as their armor vest (the effectiveness are already in muddy question), their rifles, pistols and Kevlar helmets but still by standards, these are not adequate to reference the hostage crisis situation.It is very evident that they were not even carrying with them flashlights but all of the time they were reporting and complaining that the interior of the bus was dark. The lack of equipment already put the breaching operation into a compromise. The element of surprise was gone that resulted into a stall that lasted for sometime thereby endangering lives. The doubt regarding the effectiveness of their armor vest contributed to the apprehension of the SWAT members to rush inside the bus during the assault.The Manila SWAT was not only ill-equipped but they were not trained in different kinds o f situations. In fact they had to rehearse on the very twenty-four hours of the hostage situation. The trainings of the Manila SWAT as provided by the Manila natural law District are not updated and simulated operations were conducted, if ever conducted, was a long time ago. They dont even know the sequential numbers of their guns at an instant query. They train on their own in-person account. Skill acquired through trainings diminishes after some time and needs to be constantly updated.VI. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CRISIS MANAGEMENT TEAMVII. CONCLUSIONSThe reasons presented for the de feloniousisation are obviously overwhelming. In a nutshell, by all standards, Gen. Magtibay was an incompetent commander, personal digital assistant and manager. To top this off, he was also grossly and recklessly insubordinate at a most crucial moment. One is tempted to put the whole blame on the hostage debacle upon him, if not for the equally incomprehensible lapses and indecisions act b y both his superiors and men all throughout the hostage crisis, specifically on strategy, intelligence, coordination, and deployment. But it is without question that he carries the biggest accountability for the disastrous and homicidal outcome of the hostage crisis. As such, it stands to reason for the Senate and the House of Representatives to give decriminalization of libel a chance.Honestly, as an individual I got pissed off because those people tasked to handle the situation didnt do it by the book. foremost and foremost to be considered is the safety of the hostages which as viewed was never the order of antecedence of those people expected to save same. In all hostage-taking drama that Ive known, neutralizing the hostage-taker is no. 1 in the agenda, which if initially done could have prevented the carnage. I just hope this wont happen again, but if it does- just neutralize the hostage-taker once and the drama will end Its such a shameful and horrific event that the only po sitive thing we get out of the experience is to learn something from it. From that Learn we have to our mistakes. .VIII. testimonialThe investigation report also recommended administrative or criminal charges for 15 individuals and organizations, including Manila mayor Alfredo Lim, Vice-Mayor Isko Moreno, ombudsmen Merceditas Gutierrez and Emilio Gonzales III, government undersecretary Rico J. Puno, retired Philippine National law chief director general Jesus Verzosa, National Capital neighbourhood Police Office director Leocadio Santiago Jr., Manila Police District chief superintendent Rodolfo Magtibay, MPD hostage negotiator Orlando Yebra, SWAT commander Santiago Pascual, journalists Erwin Tulfo and Mike Rogas, and three broadcasting networks.The IIRC recommended that an administrative case be filed against negotiator police Superintendent Orland Yebra and that possible criminal liability should be determined, but the castle only recommended neglect of duty without any recomm endation on possible criminal case. The IIRC also recommended that Chief Inspector Santiago Pascual be held liable for gross incompetence and possible criminal action, but the Palace affirmed the gross incompetence case without recommendation for possible criminal liability. The filing of administrative and criminal cases against Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim, but Malacanang said that Lim should be held liable for simple neglect of duty and misconduct. Charges be filed against several(prenominal) personalities but the recommendation was revised when it reached Malacaang.IX. REFERENCES1.First Report of the INCIDENT INVESTIGATION and go off COMMITTEE on the August, 23, 2010 Rizal Park Hostage-taking accident SEQUENCE OF EVENTS, EVALUATION and RECOMMENDATIONS, Incident Investigation and Review Committee, September 16, 2010, pp. 910, 16, 22, 24. 2.Hong Kong criticizes handling of Manila hostage crisis. Reuters. August 23, 2010. http//www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/23/us-philippines-hostag e-hongkong-idUSTRE67M35B20100823. Retrieved July 14, 2011. 3.Mair, John Blanchard, Ben (August 24, 2010). Philippines defends handling of bus hostage crisis. International Business Times. 4.http//uk.ibtimes.com/articles/45880/20100824/philippines-defends-handling-