Employment-At-Will Doctrine Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Employment-At-Will Doctrine - Essay theoretical accountFor instance, under the doctrine the employer can terminate additional work benefits, reduce employees vocational clock or even, revise the salary agreements (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2013). Scenario 1 seats actions damage the unions image and thus, they are non admissible to ignorance. John did not consider the effects of his actions and thus, it is lawfully right for the company fire him. According to the employment-at-will doctrine, the employer can just fire the employee without notice and thus, firing John without notifying him will not bring any level-headed indebtedness on the company. The ethical theory that best(p) supports my determination is consequentialism. Scenario 2 In this scenario, I would not fire Jim. This is because the employment-at-will doctrine has an exception referred to as retaliation, which states that if employees betroth in activities such as claiming minimum wage or overti me compensation, then the doctrine shall not hold (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2013).Therefore, to limit the liability in this case, I would listen to the claims of the salespersons and changing the citizens committee consider changing the schedules. Scenario 3 Ellen should be fired. This will not impose any legal liability on the company since she cannot claim the retaliation exception (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2013). The company could even specify to sue her based on libel and slander. However, to reduce the costs incurred, I would just fire her. My decision in this case is supported by the virtue ethics (Graham, 2004). Ellen has no virtues if she can act so maliciously to get her things done. Scenario 4 I would not fire Bill since there are no legal grounds to fire him. This is because he has not committed any conflict of interest by using the phone. As long as using the phone in his business does not game its use in the company, and then the c ompany cannot terminate his employment. Scenario 5 Installing key logger software package in the company computers is a way of protecting the companys business and it is beneficial to some(prenominal) the employees and the company. Therefore, protesting such an important issue would only imply that the secretaries have hidden motives, which would be jeopardized by the installed software. I would fire these secretaries since considering their protest would put companys data at risk. In addition, the secretaries are not following ethics of principle, which states that principles are just a matter of reasoning and logic. To reduce the liability suffered in this case, I would ensure that I employ other secretaries with immediate effect. Scenario 6 I would fire Joe since it is lawfully permissible to do so. The employee has committed acts that harm the companys operations. The company has the right to sue him without notifying him since it has legal reasons and thus, no liability woul d arise from dismissal of the employer. In addition, Joe has no grounds to sue the company since although his concealing was invaded, it was concerning the company. My decision in this case is supported by ethics of cognitive moral development, which assert that as an individual grows he or she should be able to use critical thinking tactics to crystallize problems (Graham, 2004). Critically in this case, Joe definitely would not have used a company