Modernization Vs. Dependency Theory Essay -- Political Science

LDC Advisement Modernization Theory vs Dependency TheoryThe rails to modernization is one never clearly defined. The following report pass on attempt to analyze and critique our nations potential options concerning friendly and fiscal policy and use this information in an attempt to recommend future policy agenda. We will be dealing with primarily dickens theories on national (i.e. LDC) policy - modernization possibleness and dependency theory. or so(prenominal) have their own sets of costs and benefits as well as they do policy approaches. But before we go further, we must compare the two in attempt to see if either would via media our governments mandate.Currently our nation has found itself at a crossroads betwixt the age the western world has to offer and our own historical value and ethnic integrity. We have various entities prodding us toward opposite ends of the spectrum. Our hostile investors adjure unless for further industrialization and perhaps semipolitic al stability to further their own aims while certain conservative elements at situation fear we our losing our cultural identity. A modernist approach would align itself with that of our foreign investors and MNCs operating within our state of matter. The theory claims that our society suffers from being traditional in so far as that we sacrifice economic and industrial progress by placing too great a focus on our cultural heritage (which largely includes religious ideals). The theory goes on to state that in order to modernize we must make further efforts to secularize our governmental processes and as have many western-industrialized nations separate church and state to as great a deal as possible. While such(prenominal)(prenominal) an approach may satisfy foreign monetary interests we run a very real risk of a political backlash out-of-pocket to this cultural-imperialism of the west. If this backlash were to lead to internal instability we may not totally scare off potent ial foreign investments but also compromise our own legitimacy to rule. This may effectively place our state in a worse position than with which we began The approach of the dependencistas however would allow in for much greater cultural preservation though it is an approach not as much favored by the western powers-that-be. Dependency theory supports the feeling that the western world wishes to impose its customs/ideals/ and so on upon all - unheeding of the cult... ...e recommendation entails as follows The country needs to set both absolutely and long-term goals for itself, each based on a specific theory of development. In the near future we need to ensure internal political stability while adopting a modernization approach to development. Groups that may present tense opposition to any resulting cultural changes need to be dealt with in some way - preferably a peaceful way, as we make our country more attractive to western investment. As more revenue/educational-opportuni ty/technological-exposure/etc. becomes available we should begin reinvesting in the infrastructure of our nation via ISI. The increased keen and knowledge we will have gained as the result of cooperation with the west should allow us to be much more competitive in the external marketplace. Specialization in a high-tech field could help us see further autonomy in the international realm. Education, goal-setting, and political stability will all be of top priority if our development plans wish to have a chance of succeeding. If we can maintain focus in our policy, we should be able to achieve much greater levels of development with only minimal cultural disintegration.