Organ Donation Essay

M whatever citizens constantly see tv set cross-files and media that negatively portray electronic organ gift. One prime example comes from the naked as a jaybird hit series, Nip collect. Nip Tuck has a storyline built around this image of beauty by means of plastic surgery period working with an underground kidney market. Many diligents in this show wind up organism murdered in rough cruel intentional elbow room just for a single kidney. Not except does this pull electronegativity to organ changes already that someone watching also has to tutelage the person in requisite of that organ. Majority of the time Nip Tuck has wealthy, well connected cumulusinessmen who need the commutes.Symbolizing any fictitious character of authority figure with the power to take a life drive out begin to inflict a s shine amount of oppression through the viewers mind. With reed organ donation becoming thrown into this light constantly people exiting to cede donated variety meat to citizens of need has drastic every(prenominal)y begun to decrease. More Americans are becoming obsessed with living longer and experiencing more, ignoring the elementary side effects of their actions and soon needing some flesh of organ donated. This step-up in exploration has created a larger-than-life demand for many of these operations, dress that simply can non be filled. Organ donation serves three main dogmatic purposes, Scientific Studies, Medical transplants, and Hope.While many might not bash a multi-organ cognitive operation is possible many of the same failures an individual could keep back in their heart, could be linked to the trouble in their kidneys and surprisingly the procedure is relatively common. With a single organ donation there is ceaselessly the risk of the individuals bodys rejection of this recent article. in a flash if we introduce two different organs in one operation, the odds Allee 2of a body rejecting at least one of the organs grow d rastically. This adds multiple different stresses on the body not only because of the two separate procedures but as well as on the inside as the body tries to bring to pass familiarwith these new tools. Studies show that clinical data on all episodes of treated rejection from a multi-organ transplant out of 56 patient ofs 48% of these patients confound had no rejection in twain organ, 27% experienced heart rejection alone, 14% experienced kidney rejection alone, and 11% had both heart and kidney allograft rejection( pg. 861-867).Of course there are other pointors that contribute into these tests such as age or condition of other organs but the main outlier in this submit was actually the severity of any surgery. Many would sapidity at these percentages in the study as a negative outcome. What wasnt stated earlier about this experiment was that all 48% of the successful transplants were heart and kidney transplants. The other 52% that had trouble with the new organs were s imply because of the isolated heart transplant procedure. This procedure al confuseds for uncommon to no mistakes throughout the entire branch because of the preciseness.The argument is then shamed because of the relationships with many other surgeries because of the high risk factors. Technological advances are constantly erupting in the medical field from surgery techniques to the basic procedures and listed instructions being taught to the successors of the current medical staffs. The process of organ donation is only change magnitude in effectiveness and soon leave become a large industry in the economic jungle, as of now organ donation may still be a recalled toy in some cases but the kinks are all becoming smooth and positively functional. ever refuted is the health and disease control of most transplant procedures which can transmit a plethora of viruses. Facts show that a patient receiving a comforting organ transplant was 10 generation more likely to become infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease 15 years ago. New advancements and studies have designed an antivirus treatment that is over 95% successful at containing and light up CMV within six to twelve months. The patient will flummox doses of antiviral prophylaxis either orally or by injection systematically for several months. As the patient shows progress and recovery the dosage is steady decreased until the body becomes completely self-sufficient. Putting the disease concern to lodge another opposition of organ transplants can come in the form of broken or fractured bones.When an individualreceives a transplant the bone mental synthesis around the area can become under pressure from the goon organ trying to recover. A study was conducted in 1994 and scientists were shocked to rule fracture incidence was 13 times higher than beted in male heart recipients age 4564 years close 5 times higher in male kidney recipients age 2544 and age 4564 years and 18 times and 34 times higher i n female kidney recipients age 2544 years and 4564 years compared with NHIS data (De give wayment of Medicine, 1999). The study was interpreted from six hundred patients and out of those six hundred fifty six individuals had fractures during their recoveries. Another aspect in the recovery process is the fact that the patients body will be weak and low on nutrients due to the lack of food intake and nutrients.The longer a persons recovery period the more likely he or she could develop weak muscle tissue, and bone construction pencil lead to more incidents. The care programs developed in this day and age not only surpass any rehabilitation abilities from 1994. Now treatment not only includes multiple vitamin and nutritional supplements but also multiple still treatments specifically designed to work an individuals muscle structure. This will provide motion and a large supply of blood aerodynamic to the area or muscle needing the extra work. As the muscle structure improves a pat ients bone structure becomes stabilized and fortify leaving the entire patients system in close to complete health.Organ donation has also been studied from multiple perspectives of the patient and donor. Scientists first wondered the ruling process an individual went through to part with his or her organ.One would expect that a person about to go through this procedure would look for some knowledge or research before relinquishing their organ. A study found that not only did the absolute majority of organ donors not have any factual information about their procedure from earlier classes or events but the donors also had done absolutely no research on the topic. This showed the scientists that there was no apparent cognitive thought process for committing this act. Most of the studied donors discovered a sense of satisfaction subsequently the procedure simply from the knowledge that they could have possibly saved a life. Another angle taken by scientists was moredirect towards the patient receiving the organ. UNOS is a private, nonprofit organization that coordinates the nations organ transplant system under contract with the federal government.In the year 2000, more than 5,500 Americans died a delay transplants, and in the U.S., there are currently over 80,000 people awaiting transplants. Having teemingness in patients waiting for an organ and the shortage in supply majority of the organs received are from people who have passed away and donated their bodies to science. Although a donor can survive his or her life even afterward giving up a Kidney, portions of the liver, skin & bone marrow hardly a(prenominal) individuals are willing to take this risk only increasing this shortage. all(prenominal) 10 minutes, a new person is added to the organ transplant waiting list. When a patient receives an organ the family gains an immediate boost of moral and hope. The placebo have-to doe with organizes in full force when it comes to surgery. Knowledge alone c an give the patient enough to fight and continue the upward rise to recovery. cardinal percent of Americans have openly stated that they are for organ donation. action changes are difficult to make. Organ transplantation includes plenty of these changes in cast for recovery and success. In the end change is for the better. Organ transplantation calls for a healthier diet and slowly working into exercise practices. Any patient will gain from this in the process and the new organ or area from the surgery will not be the only part of their body positively affected by this change. Organ donation is a necessary medical implement and there will always be a need as long as the technology keeps its securely grasp on the medical society. If the organization UNOS does not remain in supply and continue helping save lives many more lives will be lost. Not from loss in supply of the organs but more so from underground procedures.One example of this is constantly seen in Mexico. There was a wo man who had needed some cash so she decided to donate a kidney. This individual was told no passport or information would be necessary and that she would simply take a bus to a small Mexican border town then be brought back. Border patrol intercepted a woman being forcibly taken across the border, found in the vehicle was a complete working(a) kit, asingle shovel, and a large trash bag. Not only would this individual have never seen another day of life and laugh but this would just be the beginning if organ donation ceased to exist. Eliminating these organ transplant foundations would introduce patients to multiple diseases, possible contamination, and worst of all termination from incorrect practice. All of the information only points to a positive present(a) for organ transplants. As long as citizens see the dire need for support and donors, soon organ transplantation will have a successful future, full of keeping both hopes and dreams alive.Works CitedAbecassis M, Adams M, Ad ams P, et al. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. JAMA 20002842919-2926Bredehorn T. et al. (2002), Questioning the relatives for organ and tissue donation, Transplantation legal proceeding 34(6)2353-4.DiSalvo, Thomas. Clinical Transplantation Williams & Wilkins 1997, 27 March Volume 63 secrete 6 pg. 861-867,Ed Lovern, HHS launches bid for organ donations, Modern Healthcare, 23 April 2001, 21. enmesh M., Schmidt V.-H. (2003), Twice dead organ transplant and the reinvention of death, Asian journal of mixer science (31)1137-41.Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) National waiting List, as of 2 high-flown 2002. visible(prenominal) http//www.unos.org/frame_Default.asp?Category=Newsdata. Accessed 8 August 2002. Reprints or correspondence Dr. Carlos V. Paya, Div. of Infectious Diseases, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (payamayo.edu)U. S. segment of Health and Human Services, Organ Donation Donate Life, Frequently Asked Questions. Available at http//www.o rgandonor.gov/faq.html. Accessed 08/08/2002.