Explain how Hill and Golding present death in I’m the King of the Castle and Lord of the Flies respectively? Essay

agglomerate and Golding both utilise the techniques of symbolism, varied settings and physiological finis of the character to invest destruction. Overall I telephone that Hill generally presents demolition more effectively than Golding, because she generally provides more development passim her novel, which at long last leads to the finish of Kingshaw.Hill and Golding both use the techniques of symbolism dead stating that the inside of its give tongue to was scarlet with the adjective scarlet interesting as it has connotations of remnant and of blood. I think this definition of the rejoice is withal a subtle institute of prolepsis as the exuberate is initially portrayed as a blueprint crow, but as Hill describes the crow further it is evidently a symbol of death, much like Warings. What is interesting to note about the crow is that it is also described as having ragged grisly wings- the al-Quran ragged could symbolise the aftermath of violence, much like Kingshaw s moving-picture show to violence later on in the novel and the adjective black is a symbol of death. Another aspect of symbolism regarding the crow is when the crow circles over Kingshaw, symbolically death looms over Kingshaw.This is comparable to the symbolism of death in Lord of the Flies where The Lord of the Flies also symbolises death one recitation of this is when the Lord of the Flies states were going to make fun- it is a statement, rather than a question, an imperative. The fun that is described refers to evil, ultimately the death of Simon. Another explanation of the Lord of the Flies describes that is particularly of the essence(p) is when Simon looks at the Lord of the Flies and sees blackness within, a blackness that turn out. Perhaps this symbolises not only death, but death spreading byout the island as other characters ar killed.I feel this description also has significance because both Hill and Golding use colors to symbolise death, the colour black. The authors also differ as Hills descriptions are far more graphical, for example the crow, whereas Golding is far more subtle in his description of The Lord of the Flies. I believe that Hills graphic description is more effective at portraying death, her descriptions are far more explicit but some readers may argue this to be a disadvantage as her symbols are besides clichd. I think Golding is not as effective because his descriptions are a little more implicit, and hence loses some of the value that his symbol provides in portraying death.Another way in which Hill shows death is by dint of the use of settings. Warings is described as being in full dark with the yew branches overhanging the windows. Hills typical gothic description to a modern reader is a clear signal of death, especially the Yew branches which also symbolise death. The moonlight suggests a sense of coldness in Warings, like a dead psyche for example. Warings is also described as dark and damp which emphasises H ills initial description of Warings. This is comparable to Goldings description of the unfriendly side of the island- a enthrone of terror. This is an explicit meaning, terror and death are linked.Arguably, Castle quiver is the heart of the unfriendly side of the island, Castle Rock is described as being the end of the island, literally the furthest away from the island once compared to paradise. The password end echoes the end of life- supported by the statement we shant day-dream to much hear , perhaps Golding implicitly stating that no one dreams in Castle Rock because death is the end of dreams. Once again I feel that Hill has been more successful at portraying death. Whilst her ground are clichd, she adds a greater degree of subtlety in her descriptions as well, for example the moonlight, the implicit means have greater reconditeness to them, unlike Goldings explicit descriptions.Finally Hill also presents death in a physical manner as well as through description, through the death of Kingshaw. When Kingshaw dies, it shows death on a physical level, but it may also have a deeper meaning. It was evident from the croak of the book, that Kingshaws death loomed, however the death signifies the death of the protagonist and triumph for the antagonist.This is arguably the death of innocence. This is comparable to Goldings portrayal of swinishs death, describing gluttonouss moments before his death he comprehend it before he saw it- the verb heard suggests once again Piggys death always loomed, rather like Kingshaws. Unlike the death of Kingshaw however, Piggys death signals the death of rational, not innocence. I think that Hill has been more effective at portraying death because her description of Kingshaw creates far more emotion rather than the death of Piggy, Goldings descriptions are too dull.In summary both authors portray death through the use symbolism, settings and physical death. I think that portrayal of death is rattling effective, especia lly Hills description. Hill develops her characters throughout her novel, and when Kingshaw dies it is a genuine shock to the reader. Because of Goldings lack of development, Piggys death is not as ablaze as Kingshaws.