Family Violence

1. What is the general in the point with regards to hollo in this condition? The word shows statistically that if you be manlike and aim been a victim of violence or family violence you have a higher(prenominal) risk of becoming an abuser compared to some ane who has non been exploited. And those family violence victims have a higher incidence of developing amiable health issues and personalisedity disorders, abuse drugs or alcohol, or have been aban tangle withed as nestlingren.2. What is the strange in the familiar? The oblige shows how witnessing or being victimized by violence as a child or adolescent diverged the perception of these offenders mentation and embodiments of acceptable deportments which made violence against other person to be acceptable practice.3. What readiness this denomination add to understanding international offenders? I moot that it would be evoke to see how the statistics would change once the offenders went by dint of extensive therapy. Would the therapy break or mend the cycle of violence? And by how oft?4. What does this issue identify more or less authorisation affectionate marginalization? Because these offenders have been victimized themselves they have become the perpetrator as this is what they know to be the norm for them. In times of crisis or change they would do what they know until they know better. Unfortunately the excogitation of behavior has changed their watch of what is normal behavior and they lack the skills to deal with change or crisis with come out of the closet violence. Thus turning a personal problem into a exoteric issue.5. What does this article identify about potential social crisis? The potential social crisis in this article is that if the pattern of family violence is non illogical it will be an inherited reputation trait for the children who witness or are victimized by it, leading to to a greater extent violent crimes and more dysfunction in families.6. After r eading this article, what social change do you think needs to be adapted? I personally think and feel that violence of any font needs to be unacceptable in society and that society as a whole should speak out about this issue by providing lots of public awareness and free accessible focus services to break the cycle of abusive behaviors.7. Who would you most likely speak out for (the offender or society)? I battle with that decision as I piece of ass identify with both sides on one hand it is very sad that the offender had to witness or undergo abuse as a child which eventually shaped them as adults. But on the other hand it is also unworthy that society is at risk base on someone elses lamentable choices therefore the cycle of violence continues.8. rehearse the structural- useable. social- conflict, and symbolic-interaction theory to this article using separately range of a function perspective, describe the issues of offenders. For the structural functional aspect the issues of the offenders would be that they hurt other human therefore they have to hire the price in jail. The social conflict issue would be poor self-esteem, been abuse or witnessed abuse themselves, possible mental health issues related to the abuse, eg. personality disorders and swollen personalities traits. The symbolic-interaction issues would be that they were raised in an environment of abuse therefore it is a pattern of behavior they know and are at rest with and believe it is the norm to behave this way.9. Would this seek be of greater disport to a sociologist favoring a structural-functional, social-conflict, or a symbolic-interaction paradigm? A sociologist favoring a symbolic-interaction paradigm because the article focuses on patterns of social interactions in particularised settings in a micro take orientation. in that respect is also scientific entropy to support the theory which would be of interest as well for a sociologist favoring this paradigm.10. Is this study, of anthropoid offenders only, guilty of sexism? No I dont think so they were not comparing males to females they just gathered selective information from a particular group and analyze it based the level on violence that they had witnessed as children and how it affected them as adults. If they had compared the equivalent data from females that would be sexism in my opinion. There is a lot of research and articles functional about violence against women but not a lot about the male offenders to get a full view of the big picture it is worthwhile to flavour at all sides to gain a broader view of where the violence originated from in the get-go place.